Cited from real sources 6 min read Updated September 2026

A framework by David Placek

David Placek's Sound Symbolism Rules for Brand Names

Sound symbolism is David Placek's rule that every letter in a name sends a signal before anyone reads its meaning. Placek founded Lexicon Branding, the firm that named BlackBerry, Azure, Sonos and Vercel, and it paid for its own research into what the 26 letters evoke. He uses that research as a filter. Decide what the name has to feel like, then favor the letters that carry the feeling and ration the ones that fight it.

What Lexicon's research found

V is the most alive and vibrant sound in the English alphabet.

So a fast car called Corvette works, and Vercel puts its V right in front.

David Placek Lenny's Podcast Watch at 46:27

The framework

Letters signal before words do

Placek judges a name by its sound before its meaning. Lexicon has invested heavily in an area of linguistics called sound symbolism. The earlier research had gaps, and the firm set out to fill them. Over four decades it has employed 253 linguists, most of them PhDs, and it works with a network of 108 linguists in 76 countries. The question behind the work:

what are the sounds of the 26 letters of the alphabet and what do they do? How do they evoke things?
Placek, on the research question Watch at 24:11

His answer is that each letter sends out a signal, which he describes as a vibration or an experience. Some of those signals hold across languages. V reads as alive whether you were born in Rome or in Sausalito, though he allows for exceptions around the world.

Placek reads the sound and the meaning together. X is fast and crisp as a sound, and as a meaning it has said innovation on everything from aircraft to computers. That is why SpaceX scored a 10 when a podcast host asked him to rate tech names. The other half is processing fluency. Our brains do not like complex things, he says, so a complicated name is a liability. Lexicon aims for names that are surprisingly familiar. Vercel is his example: ver, familiar from verus, Latin for true, joined to cel, as in accelerate.

Lexicon used that research to defend BlackBerry. The founder said he thought Lexicon's people were crazy when they presented it. Placek's first argument came from the firm's first wave of sound research, run in about six languages and six countries:

I can tell you that B is one of the most reliable sounds in the English alphabet.
Placek, on presenting BlackBerry Watch at 39:45

The name has two B's. Black reads as technology and is recognized in many languages, and some people would know the word berry. He added that their big competitors would never have the courage to put BlackBerry on a device, and the company went with the name.

How to apply it

How do you use sound symbolism to name a company?

Placek's order: the promise, then the sounds, then the names.

  1. 1

    Write the promise before any names.

    Placek starts clients on behavior and on how they will change the market. Skip that step and you end up with a list full of clouds, infos and seeks.

  2. 2

    Turn the promise into two or three sound qualities.

    If buyers have to believe you can deliver, you need confident sounds. If the product is fast, speed goes on the list. His example brief to Lexicon's software asks for smoothness and speed.

  3. 3

    Favor the letters that carry those qualities.

    From his interviews: V is alive and daring. B and P are reliable, and P, K and B together read reliable and fast. D and P are fast, and Z is really fast. S, Z and V are noisy, which is what Sonos wanted. X is fast and crisp.

  4. 4

    Ration the letters that work against it.

    O and U are slow. A fast brand can carry one of them, but not many.

  5. 5

    Keep the shape easy to process.

    Consonant, vowel, consonant, vowel is the pattern children learn language on. Rhyme and rhythm help memory: he rates DeepSeek a very good name for its rhyme and its doubled e's.

  6. 6

    Sort the shortlist by sound, then check the meaning.

    Lexicon's software ranks candidates on the qualities you asked for. A name that would suit a healing, smooth cosmetic drops out of the top 20 for a fast brand. The linguistic and meaning checks come after.

Placek ties the letters to the promise:

So believability comes from letters and sounds that are more confident, right? Like b, you know, blackberry, two b's in there.
Placek, on setting sound criteria Watch at 39:23

He gives founders the same exercise: forget about naming for now and think about behavior. They may still end up with something like InfoSeek, but at least they have set standards.

Boundary conditions

When does sound symbolism mislead?

Works best when

  • The name has to feel like one quality: fast, reliable or alive
  • You are coining or compounding a word, as with Vercel and BlackBerry
  • Several shortlisted names all pass on meaning and you need a tiebreaker
  • The room wants to reject a strong name and you need a reason to keep it

Fails when

  • You pick sounds before you have written the promise
  • The sound is right and the meaning is wrong in a market you sell into
  • The letters are right but the name is hard to say or process
  • You treat each letter's signal as universal, when he says there are exceptions

The second failure is built into the tool. When Lexicon's software, called Predict, sorts ten names by speed, it reads the letters and nothing else:

it's looking at all of the research we've done on sound symbolism and it's going well D is fast P is fast Z is really fast and it's looking for those letters. It's not commenting really on the semantics of the word
Placek, on sorting names by sound Watch at 34:39

So meaning gets its own pass. Lexicon's linguist network checks names for negative meanings, cultural or political baggage, and events like a local disaster that nobody at head office would know about. About every third or fourth project, that check kills a name before the client ever sees it. Sound can put a name on the shortlist, and the meaning checks decide whether it stays.

Sound is one layer of a larger method. It sits in the invent step of Placek's naming process, after the team has defined what winning looks like and before trademark and implementation.

Sources

Where Placek discusses this

Where experts disagree

Where operators disagree: should a name sound right or say what you sell?

David Placek

chooses letters for the signal their sound sends before anyone reads the meaning, and treats a descriptive name as an advantage given away.

Colin McIntosh

judges a consumer brand name on whether it is spellable, shareable and memorable, connotes the product, is good for SEO and has the .com available.

Both lists reward a name that is easy to say and remember. They split on meaning. A brand that sells through search and word of mouth gains from a name that says what it is; a company entering a crowded category where every rival sounds descriptive gains from a name that sounds like its promise.

Useful? Send it to the co-founder with a shortlist of names and no way to pick.

Want the full playbook?

Get 186 positioning & marketing frameworks.

28 frameworks 52 rules 101 heuristics & principles 4 operators

From Geoffrey Moore, Kim & Mauborgne, Alex Hormozi, and 1 more. Drop one .md into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. Your AI cites practitioners, not guesses.

See the pack

Instant .md download · One-time purchase · No subscription

New experts every week

Know when the next expert lands.

Gavel adds new operators to the database every week, each one with cited frameworks you can check and a note on where they disagree with the others. You found this page by searching. Get the next one by email instead.

56 experts 72 cited frameworks

Latest: Bob Moesta on The Buying Timeline

One email a week, only when new experts shipped. Unsubscribe with one click. We never sell or share email.

Related frameworks