Cited from real sources 6 min read Written by Arun Agrahri Updated October 2026

A framework by Lulu Cheng Meservey

Lulu Cheng Meservey's Going Direct: Tell Your Own Story Without a Middleman

Going direct is Lulu Cheng Meservey's rule for founder communications: tell your own story to the people who matter, in your own voice. Don't hand it to a reporter or a PR agency to pass along. Her case is about trust: an early company's best evidence is the founder's word, and every middleman between the founder and the audience dilutes it.

The audience she aims for

50 people

who feel a post speaks to them beat 4,700 hollow retweets, in Meservey's math. Going direct aims at the few people who matter.

Lulu Cheng Meservey David Senra (2026) Watch at 50:02

The framework

Your word is the asset, so keep it in your hands

Meservey launched Rostra, her founder communications firm, in March 2024 with a short manifesto, and its argument is historical. The press and publicists used to be the only way to reach a large audience, so founders handed their story to them. Today most people can be reached through social media or email, which turns that dependency into a choice, and usually a bad one. Her definition fits in one sentence:

Going direct means crafting and telling your own story, without being dependent on intermediaries.
Meservey in Go Direct: The Manifesto (2024) Read the line

Early on, a founder has little proof to show. What they have is their word, backed by their own reputation. When that word travels from founder to PR person to reporter to editor, each handoff waters it down, and the people at the end hear someone else's version. On David Senra's podcast she put the old route this way:

Why would you go to somebody else as a supplicant, asking them to carry the message for you
Meservey on David Senra's podcast (2026) Watch at 24:54

Her proof case is Anduril. As she tells it, Palmer Luckey had been fired from Facebook for supporting Trump, and few reporters would give his new company a fair hearing. So the team skipped the press and went to the buyers in person: the Marines at Quantico, Camp Pendleton, National Defense University, the CIA. They talked to those people and then showed them the product. Recruiting ran the same way.

The manifesto also says what the rule is not: going it alone, refusing help, or just posting more. The founder decides the story and tells it in their own voice, and anyone else involved helps rather than carries it.

Trust

The founder's own voice earns the trust

In the manifesto, polish, tenure and credentials don't make the best spokesperson. The best one holds the knowledge the company is built on and can fight for it when the opposition shows up. In a young company that is the founder, and she calls founders irreplaceable as evangelists.

Her crisis example comes from The Knowledge Project, where she compared two responses. Coinbase's Brian Armstrong spoke in his own name and took the comments himself, when he could have used his staff as a human shield. She guessed that lawyers or a committee wrote CrowdStrike's statement, and it read that way to her, because a committee is not a person.

Her advice for the room where counsel says to stay quiet is about job descriptions. A lawyer's job is to push legal risk toward zero. A CEO's job is to weigh every interest, trust and reputation included. Then the CEO picks the best net outcome for the company. A CEO who simply follows counsel has stopped doing that job. Her rule on apologies uses the same weighing: apologize only when you actually got it wrong, and then own it.

On the Relentless podcast she told founders to stop chasing aura. It fades with the news cycle. She would rather they build auctoritas, the Roman idea of becoming the lasting authority on a domain or a moral position. Presence and charisma are the plating, and the core is what you stand for. Going direct is how that core reaches people without someone else's edit on it.

How to apply it

How do you go direct as a founder?

Six steps, drawn from how Meservey breaks down a message on The Knowledge Project and in the Senra interview.

  1. 1

    Name the people who matter before you pick a channel.

    Meservey treats distribution as a vector: size means nothing without direction. She has watched AI companies court NPR when the goal was hiring researchers, who read niche newsletters and LessWrong threads instead.

  2. 2

    Find the message where your interests overlap theirs.

    Draw one circle for what you want to say and one for what your audience already cares about. The story worth telling sits in the overlap.

  3. 3

    Make the founder the messenger.

    Press releases, spokespeople and hired agencies hide the person the audience has to trust. A founder on video as a full human being beats an army of hired voices, in her view.

  4. 4

    Tell it through a person, as a chain of facts.

    One announcement is easy to ignore. A run of facts tied into a larger story gives people a reason to follow along, and it lands harder when the teller believes it.

  5. 5

    Answer attacks before they land.

    If you know what you will be criticized for, address it first. She calls this the pre-buttal. When real damage lands anyway, respond at once rather than letting it fester.

  6. 6

    Use the press once you can do without it.

    Build your own channel first. Then work with reporters you trust when it serves the goal.

Step four comes from the opening of her Knowledge Project interview, where she gave the formula for cutting through:

when you're trying to cut through the noise, you tell it through a human with extreme conviction and you tie facts together in a chain
Meservey on The Knowledge Project (2025) Watch at 4:49

The first step echoes Seth Godin's smallest viable audience. Godin narrows who the product is for, and Meservey applies the same narrowing to who hears the story.

Limits

When does going direct fail?

Works best when

  • The work is unconventional or unpopular, so a reporter's frame would distort it.
  • You can name the small group whose opinion decides the outcome.
  • The founder believes the story and will be its public face.
  • The goal is concrete: recruits, buyers, investors or regulators.

Fails when

  • The founder hands it to a committee and the voice goes bland.
  • It turns into posting more with no message underneath.
  • You need outside credibility that your own channel cannot give.
  • The founder cannot stomach public mistakes, since comms failures happen in front of everyone.

Meservey herself draws the line at boycotts:

going direct does not mean that you have to boycott the media.
Meservey on Uncapped with Jack Altman (2025) Watch at 49:07

She expects the press to matter more again, partly because AI assistants lean on articles. A model may not register a few friendly tweets, but one article in a known outlet can settle what it says about you. Roy Lee's controversy marketing is a louder form of the same move, with the founder speaking to the feed with no filter. Meservey judges a post by who it reaches.

Sources

Where Meservey discusses this

Where experts disagree

Where operators disagree: go around the press, or work it yourself?

Lulu Cheng Meservey

argues that traditional PR is dead and the founder should take the story straight to the people who matter, through channels the company owns. Every handoff from PR person to reporter to editor dilutes the message and filters it through someone else's worldview.

Michael Seibel

tells early founders to do their own press instead: build relationships with reporters the way you would with business partners, and offer each story as an exclusive to one tech reporter at a time, with one story every month or two.

Both cut out the PR agency; they split on whether the reporter is the channel. If you can name the people you need and reach them yourself, go direct. If you need the outside credibility of an article, which readers and AI assistants both lean on, Seibel's exclusives earn it, and Meservey agrees the press helps when it is a choice, not a dependency.

Want the full playbook?

Get 377 communication & writing frameworks.

62 frameworks 109 rules 198 heuristics & principles 8 operators

From Kim Scott, Ann Handley, Barbara Minto, and 5 more. Drop one .md into Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT. Your AI cites practitioners, not guesses.

See the pack

Instant .md download · One-time purchase · No subscription

New experts every week

Know when the next expert lands.

Gavel adds new operators to the database every week, each one with cited frameworks you can check and a note on where they disagree with the others. You found this page by searching. Get the next one by email instead.

65 experts 84 cited frameworks

Latest: Gary Klein on The Premortem

One email a week, only when new experts shipped. Unsubscribe with one click. We never sell or share email.

Related frameworks